Accelerating Computer-Based Recognition of Fynbos Leaves Using a Graphics Processing Unit
Keywords:Computer vision, image processing, automated plant identification, parallel algorithms
AbstractThe Cape Floristic Kingdom (CFK) is the most diverse floristic kingdom in the world and has been declared an international heritage site. However, it is under threat from wild fires and invasive species. Much of the work of managing this natural resource, such as removing alien vegetation or fighting wild fires, is done by volunteers and casual workers. Many fynbos species, for which the Table Mountain National Park is known, are difficult to identify, particularly by non-expert volunteers. Accurate and fast identification of plant species would be beneficial in these contexts. The Fynbos Leaf Optical Recognition Application (FLORA) was thus developed to assist in the recognition of plants of the CFK. The first version of FLORA was developed as a rapid prototype in MATLAB; it utilized sequential algorithms to identify plant leaves, and much of this code was interpreted M files. The initial implementation suffered from slow performance, though, and could not run as a lightweight standalone executable, making it cumbersome. FLORA was thus re-developed as a standalone C++ version that was subsequently enhanced further by accelerating critical routines, by running them on a graphics processing unit (GPU). This paper presents the design and testing of both the C++ version and the GPU-accelerated version of FLORA. Comparative testing was done on all three versions of FLORA, viz., the original MATLAB prototype, the C++ non-accelerated version, and the C++ GPU-accelerated version to show the performance and accuracy of the different versions. The accuracy of the predictions remained consistent across versions. The C++ version was noticeable faster than the original prototype, achieving an average speed-up of 8.7 for high-resolution 3456x2304 pixel images. The GPU-accelerated version was even faster, saving 51.85 ms on average for high-resolution images. Such a time saving would be perceptible for batch processing, such as rebuilding feature descriptors for all the leaves in the leaf database. Further work on this project involves testing the system with a wider variety of leaves and trying different machine learning algorithms for the leaf prediction routines.
Research Papers (general)
LicenseCopyright of all work published here subsists in the authors. While SACJ retains right of first publication, subsequent re-publication is expressly permitted provided the original SACJ publication is acknowledged and cited, according to the terms detailed below. If plagiarism is detected during review, a paper may be summarily rejected and will not be accepted unless even minor infringements are corrected. Should plagiarism be detected after a paper is published, the Editor reserves the right to withdraw a paper from publication. We expect authors to be honest in representing work as their own, and to respect the time and effort our reviewers put in without an undue burden of policing plagiarism, and hence take violations seriously. SACJ applies the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all papers published in this journal. Authors who publish with SACJ agree to the following:
- Authors retain copyright and grant SACJ right of first publication. The work is additionally licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that requires others who share the work to acknowledge the work’s authorship and initial publication in SACJ. Should anyone else wish to make commercial use of the work, SACJ cedes the right to the author to negotiate terms and does not expect to be paid any royalties.
- Authors may enter into additional arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the SACJ-published version of the work (e.g., post it to a repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are required to refrain from posting their work online prior to completion of reviews so as not to compromise double-blind reviewing or confuse plagiarism checks.